Million dollar burger

Rolf Coppens
May 1st 2008

PETA –People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals– has posed a challenge to the world's scientific community: The first person to come up with a method to produce commercially viable quantities of fake meat at competitive prices will receive a check for $1 million. The figure was determined by calculating the number of chickens killed every hour in the U.S. (about 1 million).

My questions are: can vegetarians eat this fake meat? Could one prove that lab-grown burgers don't have feelings? And which meat will be faked first?

See also: The meat of tomorrow, Where it came from, They are made out of meat.

Share your thoughts and join the technology debate!


Comments are members only. Login to your account and join the technology debate.

Not a member? Join us

Posted 16/05/2008 – 19:40

I disagree because they psychologically know that there was no death or suffering that went into thier meal. Done deal. And it is someone's choice-so if they choose to live in a manner that makes them more comforatble because their choices created less suffering and harm to other livng creatures-so be it. It is not yours to judge.

Posted 12/05/2008 – 03:07

Then I would have to agree with you, only in the grounds that this person doesn't eat meat because of suffering inflicted on the animal. But the point I was trying to make, is that, through eating this fake-meat with the same taste and pattern, one would be, at least at psychological level (the one I intended since the beginning), recreating the death of this same animal, enjoying the pleasure of eating the same meat that on one's moral grounds should be forbidden, and that's where I see the Irony.

Posted 11/05/2008 – 23:44

Okay, let me put it more plainly.
From the article: "...flesh that doesn't cause suffering and death." So if someone objects to eating meat purely on the grounds that it comes from suffering and death, then why wouldn't they eat the fake, suffering-free stuff?

load more

Should men be able to give birth to children?

Koert van Mensvoort: Is the artificial womb frankenstein-like symbol of (male) engineers trying to steal the magical womb from women? Or… is it a feminist project and needed to reach through equality between the sexes? I personally lean towards the latter. To me it feels like progress if a girl can tell a guy to carry the womb for a change.

Join us!
Already a member? Login.