Who Owns the Rights to a Toucan?

Allison Guy
September 27th 2011

Kellogg, the proud copyright holders of Toucan Sam, recently asked a the Mayan Archeology Initiative to reconsider their logo. Despite the fact that the two birds have entirely different colors, shapes, and expressions, Kellogg's lawyers insist that they have a special claim to family Ramphastidae.

It's particularly strange that the corporation would go after a Guatemalan non-profit when dozens of other companies have used toucans in their branding. Neither does Kellogg have time on their side: they registered Toucan Sam in 1963, while Guinness began using its iconic toucan in 1935. While the Kellogg lawsuit is frivolous, it does raise some questions about the commodification of natural images. When do animals become so wrapped up in a corporate identity that they loose their own?

Share your thoughts and join the technology debate!

 

Comments are members only. Login to your account and join the technology debate.

LOGIN
Not a member? Join us

natinja
Posted 28/09/2011 – 01:42

Truth is in the eye of the beholder and it might happen that these two logotypes really do look alike in Kellogg’s eyes. As Ernst Gombrich reminds in Art and Illusion (Phaidon, 1960), pictorial representation, and consequently perception, is really a matter of psychology.

Should men be able to give birth to children?


Lisa Mandemaker: Using an artificial womb could lead to more equality between sexes, but also between different family layouts. If men would be able to give birth to children, it would maybe be easier for male same-sex couples to have a child together.

Join us!
Already a member? Login.