murayama_flower_01
By highlighting the geometric and mechanical structure of flowers, computer graphics illustrator Macoto Murayama produced these beautiful renderings. These flowers must not be seen as "just a simulation of old nature"; they are constructional studies, made to inspire (who wouldn't want to live in a flower-tower?!).

murayama_flower_02

Check out Murayama's other awesome CG's:
murayama_flower_03

murayama_flower_04

murayama_flower_05

murayama_flower_06

murayama_flower_07

murayama_flower_08

murayama_flower_09

murayama_flower_10

murayama_flower_11

murayama_flower_12

murayama_flower_13

murayama_flower_14

murayama_flower_15

murayama_flower_16

murayama_flower_17

murayama_flower_18

murayama_flower_19

murayama_flower_20

murayama_flower_21

murayama_flower_22

murayama_flower_23

murayama_flower_24

murayama_flower_25

murayama_flower_26

murayama_flower_27

murayama_flower_28

murayama_flower_29

murayama_flower_30

murayama_flower_31

murayama_flower_exhibition

via: pinktentacle.com | Related: Would you like a Bouquet of Nanoflowers? | Lilium Urbanus | Learning to build Superman's house | Observing Next Nature | Sunflower Satellite Dish | Bone Chair | Growing a hidden Architecture

Enjoying this story? Show it to us!

0 Likes

Share your thoughts and join the technology debate!

3 comments

  • Thanks for commenting. This post may not be the best example of next nature, but I felt that it needed to be here to be able to refer to when discussing topics like biomimicking and dynamic architecture. Almost a bummer the renderings look like flowers. This resemblance to old nature would indeed be a poor choice to post them. No really; how would it be to live in a building that uses the elasticity concept of stalks? Or the folding capacity of petals? (also check the related articles) How would it be when a house had roots that could take care of the water supply as well in an organical sense? Rhetoric questions obviously, but I mean; there could be more to a house than bricks, wood and metal for a geometric experience... Made to inspire.

    Posted on

  • I agree this post is off-topic (or at least on the far border of the topic). As these are beautiful pictures, it is tempting to blog them however, when thinking of the story they convey one realizes this is rather classical: visualizing old nature as a mathematical system. Of course that is a story we have heard for centuries already. - From a next nature perspective, I would be more interested in the opposite: how mathematical systems can become nature. - Yet one could also argue that when talking about the 'nature caused by people' it is interesting to see how people visualize nature, yet I do feel these flowers fall in the category 'plastic flowers'. I did like Arnouds remark on how these images are 'construction studies' that could inspire to architects, however myself I would not want to live in a giant plastic flower. Too illustrative. Next nature doesn't look like old nature, it is more about the transferring of the pragmatic functioning of nature into new domains.

    Posted on

  • Is this really nextnature? I mean, x-rays of flowers look exactly the same. I could even print them on color paper to mimic the exact look here- or rather, Murayama has mimicked the look of an analog x-ray print. I doubt the possibility of any digital imaging (DI) to be nextnature, as any 2D art made on a computer (including 3D renderings which are displayed on a 2D screen) can be made using analog processes- from photo prints to holography. Maybe there should be an article about the Pencil of Nature.

    Posted on

More like this