While the Pacific garbage patch is often characterized as a dense, Texas-sized island of plastic, in reality it's an area of 2,736 square km scattered with tiny, floating bits of plastic. Popular conception holds that the worst effect of this junk is that it strangles animals, or accumulates in their stomachs, leading to slow, painful deaths either way.

In reality, it's much harder to suss out plastic's impact on oceanic organisms. Fish and birds do eat plastic, and in large quantities. Bottle shards and cigarette lighters were found in the bellies of dead albatross chicks. However, it may be that for most animals, nurdles more or less harmlessly pass through their digestive systems. Scientists just don't know. On the flip side of the plastic coin are ocean-faring creatures that are clearly thriving thanks to this novel material.

The "plastisphere" is a group of organisms that previously relied on floating logs, passing whales, and other organic substrates, but are now hitching rides on durable petro-products like styrofoam. Sessile organisms such as barnacles, bivalves, anemones and bryozoans, as well as small crabs and water-skaters, are now finding a home where there was once only open water. While good news for the individual organisms, it's bad news for efforts to stop invasive species. This new, uncontrollable and long-lasting transport system means that many more animals are able to complete trans-oceanic trips to new habitats. Will a Dasani bottle be the vehicle for the next zebra mussel?

Regardless of their current success, these "rafting" organisms may eventually loose out to even smaller interlopers. Debris in the oceans appears to be leveling off, possibly due to microbes that have evolved to devour petroleum-based trash. These bacteria could be truly eliminating plastic, or merely breaking it down into its component chemicals, many of them toxic, and recycling them through the ocean's food web. This is a perpetual problem with next natural materials, so new that no one can predict how they'll behave.

Via Io9. Photo from Mandy Barker's SOUP series.

Enjoying this story? Show it to us!


Share your thoughts and join the technology debate!


  • J. Lawson - Photodecomposition doesn't take place in the digestive system so, yes, plastics can hypothetically just pass harmlessly through an organism. BPAs aren't plastics. Also, although plastics are ultimately harmful to most if not all organisms, they can create a beneficial environment in some circumstances. It's not ulterior motives: it's science. Just because something has harmful attributes doesn't mean you just label the whole thing awful and refuse to look at the evidence. See: chemotherapy.

    Posted on

  • You are mistaken. Plastics are not "harmlessly passing through digestive systems" Photodecomposition of plastics merely breaks plastics down into smaller particles releasing Bisphenol A (BPA) and other toxic and carcinogenic materials. All of which not only make the creatures of the sea sick, but pass along those carcinogens up the food chain to us and our children. After a lifetime of consuming toxics is a wonder we all don't have cancer. Claiming that hitching a ride on toxic debris is somehow beneficial is a ridiculously ignorant statement and suspect of ulterior motives.

    Posted on

  • http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/blogs/boy-discovers-microbe-that-eats-plastic i didn't found the original one, but i guess this will do it as well

    Posted on

  • Do you know more on the plastic-eating bacteria? I can't find any orginial article. Who is working on it now? I think it could be an amazing step in the evolution of a "next nature".

    Posted on

More like this