Proctor and Gamble, the maker of Pringles, has successfully argued in a British court that their product is ‘not a potato chip’. Pringles are also officially now, not potato sticks or potato props or products made from the potato. Why is that a win for Proctor and Gamble? A ruling otherwise would result in a 17.5% sales tax from the British national tax office. Proctor and Gamble's lawyers argued to the court that their product had a shape not found in ‘nature’ and that a typical Pringle contains less than 50% of the potato. We’re not sure what makes up the other half of the Pringle – besides potato – but we are hoping it has nothing to do with the giant mustache of the man on the Pringle package. Via: Consumerism & LA Times.

Enjoying this story? Show it to us!

0 Likes

Share your thoughts and join the technology debate!

2 comments

  • They add lots if rice flour now. This I discovered after noting how un-potatoey they tasted these data. Haven't eaten one in four years now!

    Posted on

  • >"We're not sure what makes up the other half of the Pringle" (To parafrase Microserfs:) 50% non-potato additives, of course...

    Posted on

More like this